Data Privacy Is the New Brand Promise
-
By
Arthur Kellan
- Opinion
- 5 min read
- Opinion
- 5 min read
Just ten years ago, privacy policies were among the most ignored information items online. We clicked “Accept” without reading a single line, leading almost all companies to perceive data protection as an unnecessary expense for their legal department.
Today, the situation has changed. In an era of regular scandals, data privacy has transformed into a marketing signal that literally determines whether a consumer will stay with you or switch to a competitor who promises less surveillance.
From Compliance to Competitive Signal
Upgrading of companies’ perception of user data privacy began with the “nuclear explosion” provoked by the GDPR regulations [1]. Until then, the data environment resembled a post-apocalyptic world, where the way you collect personal information was limited only by your tech capabilities. Meanwhile, such regulations built a reality where personal data cannot belong to companies by default and forever – it’s only temporarily held in their secure storage.
Another shift occurred when businesses began using privacy compliance for their brand positioning. Moreover, giants like Apple have even made privacy their USP.
As a result, we can now see how boring texts are being transformed into full-fledged landing pages. This information is no longer hidden – businesses that have achieved compliance proudly bring it to the forefront. This means that privacy has become a signal that a brand is technologically advanced enough not to resell its users’ data for additional income.
Trust as a Scarce Resource
These days, we’re witnessing a paradoxical situation: while secure data collection technologies have proliferated, users are increasingly reluctant to share their data. According to the Edelman Trust Barometer [2], consumers now value the ethical handling of their personal data as much as the quality of the product or service itself.
The root cause of this is an erosion of digital trust – precedents of leaks that led to the hacking of individuals’ digital profiles, the Cambridge Analytica scandal [3], and, of course, overly intrusive retargeting have created a feeling of constant surveillance among internet users. They’re no longer willing to give their trust to just any business upfront – now, it must be earned with every request for access to any user data, from geolocation to email.
Companies that recognized the scarcity of this resource early on have ultimately embraced radical transparency. Indeed, in a world where algorithms know far more about us than our closest friends, a brand that consciously doesn’t collect or request “anything extra” and protects what isn’t collected emerges victorious.
Ultimately, data protection serves a dual purpose: protecting users from hackers and from the company itself, without, of course, reducing the value of its product or service to the consumer. This leads to the clear conclusion that the absence of surveillance is simply a form of respect, rewarded with consumer trust and loyalty.
The Cost of Getting Privacy Wrong
Today, the consequences of data mishandling extend far beyond trivial legal disputes. The days of warnings are over – regulators like the FTC have adopted the practice of imposing fines equal to a multiple of annual revenue.
It’s also important to understand that a data breach, even if caused by a technical glitch, ultimately results in a betrayal of trust. Specifically, according to research [4], up to 66% of users stop using a service immediately after being informed of a breach. Worst of all, this churn cannot be offset by conventional marketing, simply because the cost of acquiring a new customer for a compromised brand skyrockets. Let’s check the biggest failures in this category and their cost to companies.
|
Brand
|
Incident
|
Financial results
|
Consequences
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Meta
|
Cambridge Analytica's GDPR violations
|
Fines over $6 billion
|
Market decline and need for a global rebranding to Meta
|
|
Equifax
|
Data breach of 147 million consumers
|
Fines totaling $700 million
|
Lifetime status of being an untrustworthy agency
|
|
Didi
|
Violation of data security laws
|
Fine of $1.2 billion
|
Delisting from the New York Stock Exchange
|
|
T-Mobile
|
Series of customer data breaches during 2021-2023
|
Claim payments totaling $350 million
|
Mass exodus of loyal subscribers to competitors
|
Privacy as Product Architecture
The only way to implement proper data governance and minimize regulatory risks is to adhere to the privacy by design concept, which states that if a system physically cannot store unnecessary data, it cannot be stolen. In essence, businesses are forced to shift their paradigms from information accumulation to zero-knowledge. This explains why it makes sense to build product architectures based on principles of minimization. Incidentally, companies like Signal and Apple have long implemented end-to-end encryption and edge computing, where personal information is processed on the user’s device (instead of on the company’s servers).
Here are a few more privacy principles to consider:
Zero-knowledge proofs, a technology that allows a server to confirm that you are you (or that you are 18 years of age) without collecting, much less storing, your personal data;
Differential privacy, a method used for years by Google and Apple that adds mathematical noise to data so that the companies’ algorithms can analyze general trends without deanonymizing a specific individual;
On-the-fly depersonalization, achieved through the automatic deletion of PII as soon as the data enters the analytics system.
Conclusion
Brands that have made data protection their main value have ultimately achieved much more than avoiding hefty fines. They have also built a strong emotional connection with users, based on respecting personal boundaries and providing a sense of safety, at least on the web.
Sources:
[1] – What is GDPR, the EU’s new data protection law?
[2] – Edelman Trust Barometer
[3] – Facebook–Cambridge Analytica data scandal
[4] – 66% of consumers would not trust a company following a data breach
Arthur Kellan
Discover with Vireon Press
